Clinical Evaluation of Biotrue Hydration Plus Multipurpose Solution in Daily Use with Planned Replacement Soft Contact Lenses
CLOSE
MENU

Clinical Evaluation of Biotrue Hydration Plus Multipurpose Solution in Daily Use with Planned Replacement Soft Contact Lenses


Content provided by Bausch + Lomb Medical Affairs.

Clinical Evaluation of Biotrue Hydration Plus Multipurpose Solution in Daily Use with Planned Replacement Soft Contact Lenses


Content provided by Bausch + Lomb Medical Affairs.

Summary

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a new dual-disinfectant investigational multi-purpose solution (MPS) for contact lens care compared to a commercially available MPS when used by habitual planned replacement soft contact lens (CL) wearers to clean and disinfect their CLs.

METHODS: Habitual planned replacement spherical soft CL wearers ≥18 years of age were recruited across 18 sites for a 3-month study in which they were randomized 1:1 to use either the study (test) MPS or a comparator (control) MPS (ReNu Advanced) as their CL care system. Key effectiveness outcomes included overall comfort and vision, averaged over all scheduled follow-up visits, and the proportion of eyes with maximum degree of front-surface deposits grade ≤2 over all scheduled follow-up visits. The key safety outcome measure was the proportion of eyes with slit-lamp findings >grade 2 at any follow-up visit. Each key outcome was evaluated statistically using a one-sided non-inferiority test with a one-sided alpha risk of 0.025.

RESULTS: In total, 143 (286 eyes) were dispensed the test MPS and 151 (302 eyes) were dispensed the control MPS. For each effectiveness outcome, the test MPS was non-inferior to the control MPS: mean (SD) comfort ratings were 91.7 (10.0) and 90.7 (10.8), respectively, and vision ratings were 95.5 (6.7) and 94.3 (7.8), respectively. Front surface deposits were grade ≤2 for 99.3% with the test MPS and 97.7% with the control MPS. No subject with the test MPS had incidence of slit-lamp findings >grade 2, with demonstrated non-inferiority to the control MPS. There were also no significant, severe, or unanticipated MPS-related adverse events in either arm; all adverse events were mild and resolved by the conclusion of the study.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that this investigational MPS formulation is safe and effective when used as directed and supports robust comfort and vision for planned replacement soft CL wearers.

For More Information:

Get Support

Contact Us

Contact a
Representative

Find My Local Rep link-out icon

Submit a
Medical Inquiry

Complete the Form