Real-world experience with lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a provider survey
CLOSE
MENU

Real-world experience with lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a provider survey(3)


Content provided by Bausch + Lomb Medical Affairs.

Real-world experience with lifitegrast ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye disease: a provider survey(3)


Content provided by Bausch + Lomb Medical Affairs.

Summary

PURPOSE: Lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% is indicated for the treatment of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED). This survey of eyecare providers aimed to examine real-world utilization and outcomes of lifitegrast in the treatment of patients with DED.

METHODS: Eyecare providers (ECPs: ophthalmologists and optometrists) treating patients with DED were invited to complete a provider survey. The survey included items regarding practice characteristics, lifitegrast utilization, satisfaction, and adverse events (AEs). Satisfaction with lifitegrast relative to other prescription eye drops was rated on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). ECPs also provided case study data for up to five patients with DED who initiated lifitegrast treatment.

RESULTS: Twelve ECPs (6 MDs, 6 ODs) responded; they reported on a mean of 1288 (range, 35-6000) patients diagnosed with DED per year, of whom 21%, on average, received lifitegrast treatment. Seven ECPs provided 33 case reports. Overall, ECPs reported that DED severity was mild in 24.1%, moderate in 50.5%, and severe in 19.1% of patients to whom lifitegrast was prescribed. Lifitegrast was commonly prescribed to some patients with contact lens-related DED (91.7% of ECPs) and before or after refractive surgery (83.3% of ECPs) or cataract surgery (83.3% of ECPs). Two-thirds (67%) of ECPs reported near/complete symptom resolution in patients after 1 to 3 months of lifitegrast treatment. Satisfaction ratings (mean [range]) for onset and effectiveness were 6.8 (3-9) and 6.6 (3-9), respectively. Improvement was sustained during treatment up to 12 months, supported by case data (mean [range], 15 [1-69] months). AEs considered by the ECPs as related to lifitegrast use included blurred vision, burning/stinging, and dysgeusia; all AEs were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this real-world survey of ECPs highlight the rapid and durable response associated with lifitegrast for the treatment of patients with DED. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of lifitegrast.

For More Information:

Get Support

Contact Us

Contact a
Representative

Find My Local Rep link-out icon

Submit a
Medical Inquiry

Complete the Form