Retrospective real-world evidence study: Utilisation patterns and clinical outcomes with Artelac Ultra 4S dry eye lubricating drops in patients with dry eye disease
CLOSE
MENU

Retrospective real-world evidence study: Utilisation patterns and clinical outcomes with Artelac Ultra 4S dry eye lubricating drops in patients with dry eye disease


Content provided by Bausch + Lomb Medical Affairs.

Retrospective real-world evidence study: Utilisation patterns and clinical outcomes with Artelac Ultra 4S dry eye lubricating drops in patients with dry eye disease


Content provided by Bausch + Lomb Medical Affairs.

Summary

AIM: To document real-world patient characteristics, utilisation patterns, and clinical outcomes with Artelac Ultra 4S (AS) lubricating eye drops (sodium hyaluronate, trehalose, fucoidan, D-panthenol) in patients with dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS: This retrospective, multi-country, cross-sectional case review study included currently licensed ophthalmologists with ≥3 years' experience treating patients with DED, and ≥1 years' experience with ≥1 of the DED study drops. Healthcare providers (HCPs) provided a deidentified, retrospective convenience sample of lubricating eye drop cases using a standardised case report form. The protocol received central institutional review board exemption. Here, we report the sub-analysis of patients treated with AS.

RESULTS: This interim sub-analysis included five cases from one ophthalmologist unless otherwise specified. Patients had a mean±SE age of 47.4±7.9 years, were all female, were not contact lens users, and 40% had ocular comorbidities (including previous cataract surgery and glaucoma). Two patients received prior DED treatment (hyaluronic acid-based drops), which were not considered effective enough in both patients. All patients used AS lubricating eye drops QID. At a mean±SE follow-up of 37.2±2.9 weeks, improvements from baseline were reported in mean tear break-up time (TBUT) and Schirmer test. In all cases, the HCP reported improvements in the signs, symptoms, and patient-reported symptoms of DED. In 4/5 cases, clinical effectiveness was rated as "very effective" (one case was ranked as "somewhat effective"), with no tolerability concerns reported. Additionally, no treatment-related adverse events related to the study drug were reported.

CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world retrospective case review, most HCPs considered AS to be very clinically effective, with patients experiencing decreased signs and symptoms, with no tolerability concerns and no adverse events reported.

For More Information:

Get Support

Contact Us

Contact a
Representative

Find My Local Rep link-out icon

Submit a
Medical Inquiry

Complete the Form